Tuesday, August 27, 2019

イェール大学経営大学院 (Yale SOM) Applications Down 15%

  1. Applications to the full-time MBA program at Yale SOM declined 15.6% between 2018 and 2019, from 3,785 to 3,194, more than double the decline of the year before. 
  2. Domestic applications sank 13%
  3. International applications dropped 19% 
In the last three years, applications to Yale SOM have declined 22% from their high of 4,098 in 2016-17. 

Yale School of Management saw declines on average Graduate Management Admission Test score, on acceptance rate, on yield, on GPA and even on percentage of women in the class.




Yale SOM’s Class of 2021 is 345 strong, down two spots from last year, with 42% women (down from 43% the last three years) and 44% international passport holders (a number that includes dual citizens and U.S. permanent residents), including representatives of 47 countries. The percentage of under-represented students of color, which increased 1 percentage point from 12%, while the total students of color ticked up 2 points, to 29%. The class also has enrolled the highest-ever number of military veterans — 18, up from just 10 last year.

The Class of 2021's  Graduate Record Exam scores, saw a one-point improvement in the average Quant score, to 164, to go with maintaining a 165 in the Verbal; that moved Yale’s overall score up a point from last year, to 329 — likely among the top overall scores of any B-school.



 
The Average work experience for members of the Class of 2021 is 5.1 years, up from 4.8 last fall. Most (20%) hail from financial services jobs, with consulting (19%) a close second and nonprofit (15%) a close third. The nonprofit number is up 3 percentage points and easily the highest of any top school. Thirty percent have STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math) undergraduate degrees, up from 29% last year, while 28% studied in the humanities/social sciences, 23% have business degrees, and 19% have economics degrees. The latter two categories represented 21% each of the Class of 2020.
But GPA is down, to 3.64 from last year’s record high of 3.71; average score on the GMAT is down three points, to 721; acceptance rate is up 5 percentage points in one year, to 25%, and nearly 8 points since the school notched its record low in 2017; and yield is down, to 43% from 45%.

Friday, August 23, 2019

Applications Plummet AGAIN at U.S. Business Schools


Many MBA programs experiencing double-digit drops. 

 In 2018 the top 10 business schools combined saw a drop of about 3,400 MBA applicants, a 5.9% falloff to 53,907 candidates for the 2017-2018 admissions cycle versus 57,311 the year before.


Major Falls Last Year: 
  • The University of Michigan Ross School of Business = 8.5% decline
  • Harvard Business School =  4.5% decline
  • UC-Berkeley’s Haas School of Business = 7.5% decline
  • The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania = 6.7% decline
  • Stanford Graduate School of Business = 4.6% decline
  • THe University of Chicago Booth School of Business = 8.2% decline

Major Falls This Year: 
  •  Dartmouth Tuck = 22.5% decline
  •  Kelley School of Business = 30% decline (40% over three years)
  • UNC Kenan-Flagler Business School = 25%
  • Emory Goizueta Business = 25% decline 
  • Yale SOM = 15.6% decline plunge to 3,194 from 3,785 last year.
  • University of Michigan = 14% decline
  • McCombs School of Business = 6.6% from last year but down a troubling 24.9% in three years from its all-time peak of 2,586 apps in 2017.
  • Indiana Kelley has declined 40.% percent compared to the 2016-2017 cycle.

10% TO 20% OF TOP 100 U.S. MBA PROGRAMS COULD CLOSE IN A FEW YEARS
It is predicted that 10% to 20% of the top 100 MBA programs in the U.S. will likely close in the next few years, with even greater fallout among second- and third-tier schools. 

School Year-Over-Year Change In MBA Apps (%) Year-Over-Year Change In MBA Apps 2018-2019 Apps 2017-2018 Apps 2016-2017 Apps 3-Year Trend
Indiana (Kelley)-31.5%-3417411,0821,247-40.6%
UNC (Kenan-Flagler)-24.7%-4351,3231,7582,151-38.5%
Emory (Goizueta)-24.2%-3261,0221,3481,146-10.8%
Dartmouth (Tuck)-22.5%-5892,0322,6212,610-22.1%
Yale SOM-15.6%-5913,1943,7854,098-22.1%
Duke (Fuqua)-14.6%-5213,0363,5573,796-20.0%
NYU (Stern)-7.0%-2633,5183,7813,927-10.4%
Georgetown (McDonough)-6.9%-1011,3581,4591,742-22.0%
Texas (McCombs)-6.6%-1371,9412,0782,586-24.9%
Michigan (Ross)-6.2%-1982,9903,1883,485-14.2%
USC (Marshall)-5.9%-1181,8992,0171,998-5.0%
Pennsylvania (Wharton)-5.4%-3495,9056,2456,692-11.8%
Virginia (Darden)-3.9%-892,1902,2792,736-20.0%
Rice (Jones)6.5%38625587813-23.1%
Chicago (Booth)3.4%1444,4334,2894,6774-5.2%


Saturday, June 22, 2019

Applications for MBA courses at ロンドン・ウォーリック・ビジネス・スクール surge

  • 15 MBA programmes at the UK’s most renowned business schools are set for a bumper year after applications for the premium graduate courses rose by as much as 21 per cent at the same time as their US counterparts continue to struggle to attract students. 
  • Warwick Business School, London’s Cass Business School and Cranfield School of Management are on track for double-digit percentage year-on-year increases for applications to start in autumn 2019.
  • Demand for London Business School, the highest ranked British MBA provider on the Financial Times global rankings, is up 3 per cent on 2018. By contrast many US schools are forecasting a fifth year of declining demand.
        The surge in applications also confounds predictions made by many academics in the wake of the 2016 EU referendum that students would feel less welcome in the UK as Brexit approaches. One thing we can all agree on about Mr Trump is that he is the biggest plus for UK higher education. One theory is that the US trade war with China has diminished the attractiveness of American MBA providers, which were already suffering as a result of tightening visa restrictions, and made the UK appear a better option in terms of work opportunities after graduation. 
       Cass, part of City University in London, has attracted significant interest from Chinese and other Asian students, who would otherwise have applied to US schools, according to Steve Thomas, associate dean for MBA programmes. 
 
“One thing we can all agree on about Mr Trump is that he is the biggest plus for UK higher education,” Mr Thomas said. “His behaviour in relation to China, and against companies like Huawei in particular, is making the US significantly less attractive to students from Asia.” 
 
       Cambridge’s Judge Business School is the only one of the 11 UK members in the FT’s top 100 MBA ranking list whose applications have fallen in the past 12 months. A spokesman for the school blamed uncertainty over the UK’s departure from the EU. Brexit, it was assumed, would restrict or complicate the student visa process and dampen postgraduate students’ job prospects. 
       However, Brexit is not a deciding factor for many of those currently applying for course places, according to the most recent student survey by MBA entrance exam administrator the Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAC). Its poll, conducted last December, found that 54 per cent said Brexit had no impact on their decision whether or not to study in the UK. 
 
  • Demand for the MBA globally was broadly flat last year, according to GMAC’s most recent global applications survey, with an 8.8 per cent increase in the Asia Pacific region offset by a 6.6 per cent decline in the US. 
  • Some of the sharpest falls in applications in the US have been at leading institutions, such as Harvard Business School and Chicago’s Booth School of Business. Both have frozen their tuition fees at 2018 levels, widely interpreted as a defensive move to prevent demand for their courses falling further.

MBAにまだ価値はあるか?WSJ読者の声

多くのMBA課程修了者はプログラムがキャリアアップに貢献したと話している
ウォール・ストリート・ジャーナル(WSJ)は最近、米国の大学で経営学修士号(MBA)課程の入学者が減少し、より短期かつ専門的な修士課程やオンライン課程の人気が高まっていると伝えた。こうした状況を巡り、MBAの価値を巡る議論が巻き起こった。
 現役の学生や卒業生、企業の採用担当者や学者など300人を超える人々が意見を寄せ、オンライン課程のメリットやMBA入学前に実社会で経験を積む必要性などを訴えた。入学者減少の原因として、力強い労働市場や学費の上昇、負担の大きい学生ローンなどがある。
 それでも、多くの読者はMBAがキャリアアップに貢献したと断言した。オンライン学習が学校での全日制の授業に匹敵し得るとの考えには反対だった。財務諸表の読み方などMBAで学ぶ基本的な内容について、高校などもっと早い段階に組み込むべきだとの意見もあった。
 以下は、コメント欄への投稿やニュースレターおよびポッドキャストへの電子メール、記者の取材で得られた意見の一部。短縮・明確化のため、編集を加えたものもある。
従来型の対面式MBAプログラムが最良
 MBAのオンライン課程というものが理解できない。1980年代半ばに私が履修した際、MBA課程の大半はケース分析で、その討論への参加具合によって成績の半分が決まるのが普通だった。私から見て最も大きな違いは、その場で分析しなければならなかった点だ。仕事の会合では現場での貢献が求められる。その場を離れて、オンラインで参加する訳にはいかない。
――ミシガン大学でコンピューターサイエンスを教えるニコール・ハミルトン氏(68)
 全日制MBAプログラムは、オンラインでは得られない同級生との交流を促進し、チームワークの経験や能力を伸ばすのに役立つ。学生が給料を犠牲にして全日制課程に通うのは、時間やお金を投じてMBAを取得すれば長期的に報われると確信しているからだ。私はまずまずの仕事をやめて全日制MBA課程に行き、新しい仕事で給料が大幅に増えた。メリットは何年も続いた。
――エンジニアと監査人を引退した、ペンシルベニア州のサイレシュ・カパディア氏(73)
オンラインMBAには重要な要素が欠けている
 社会ではデジタル化が進んでいるが、通学式のMBAはそれでも強いバリュープロポジションを提供する。それには「知識」と「人」という2つの大きな要素がある。オンラインMBAは経済的だが、提供できるのは知識だけだ。授業や教授はオンライン課程に配置できるが、討論や知り合いはそうはいかない。そのため、オンラインでのMBA取得への流れによってトップクラスの対面式MBAのネットワークがさらに強力かつ特別になる。
――ビジネスモデルを開発するフロリダ州のアンジェル・アントリン・ムリロ氏(24)
MBAの学費は高過ぎる。バリュープロポジションの向上が必要だ
 「エリート向け」全日制MBAプログラムを修了した経験から断言できるのは、そうした学校でさえ、上昇の一途をたどる学費にいら立つ学生がかなり多いことだ。上位校に学費を下げる意思がなく、価格競争を始めようとしないのは、価値低下を示唆することになるリスクが一因だ。無関心のせいでもある。MBAにはなお価値があるが、人々がもう学費を払いたくないと思うポイントに全ての学校が達するのは時間の問題にすぎない。転換点は学校側の認識より近い。
――ニューヨーク州の経営コンサルタント、ロバート・モランディ氏(28)
オンラインMBA課程は重要なニッチ市場を生める
 失業中に(オンラインの)MBA課程を始めた。最初の授業の1週目が終わったところで採用が決まった。世界のどこにいようと授業はいつでも受けられる。空き時間に授業を入れることができた。会計の学士号を持っていたため、プロジェクト管理や生産・運営管理の知識を広げたかった。MBAは1つの資格だと思っている。
――カリフォルニア州の会計士、ブライアン・スティーブンス氏(49)  
MBA取得はキャリアの財産
 良い仕事と家庭があったため、全日制MBAプログラムには通わなかったし、そうする価値はなかったと思う。大学の教授の1人が、博士号取得のために大学に残ったせいで得られなかった給料を取り戻すのに少なくとも10年かかったと話していた。私の場合、全日制に通えば給料だけでなく、雇用主による授業料補助も失っていた。MBAの元は取れたと思う。私はエンジニアで、MBA後には何年か経営に関与した。それから技術畑に戻ったが、以前より高い水準だった。
――コロラド州のエンジニア、スチュアート・ボール氏(62)
MBAで教わるスキルはもっと早くに教えるべきだ
 損益計算書やマーケティング、企業や社会の責任、初歩的な金融の基礎は高校生の段階で理解しておくべきだと思う。必ずしもそれほど複雑でないが、こうした事柄は経済の仕組みの基本だ。こうした課程をもっと初等・中等教育の授業に盛り込んでいないのは意外だ。企業の意味やその仕組みをより理解するのに役立つ可能性があり、大学入学時にMBAの可能性を排除することもないだろう。
――マーケティング責任者を引退したアリゾナ州のトーマス・ピクルス氏(70)

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

Industries With The Highest MBA Salary Jumps


IndustryPre-MBAPost-MBADifferencePercent Difference
Consulting$86,187.56$132,601.46$46,413.8953.85%
Food, Beverage, & Tobacco$63,069.77$104,319.19$41,249.42        65.40%
Investment Management$82,531.78$121,376.06$38,844.2847.07%
Private Equity$98,393.79$136,132.35$37,738.5638.35%
Technology, Internet, & Ecommerce$85,134.21$121,897.34$36,763.1343.18%
Grand Total$79,505.75$116,248.02$36,742.2746.21%
Insurance$74,611.52$111,296.34$36,684.8249.17%
Agriculture & Forestry$73,500.00$110,029.65$36,529.6549.70%
Printing & Publishing$58,333.33$93,337.29$35,003.9560.01%
Investment Banking$92,388.89$126,049.45$33,660.5636.43%
Retail$74,844.92$108,102.71$33,257.8044.44%
Computer Services & Information Technology (IT)$80,409.30$112,810.00$32,400.7040.29%
Real Estate$76,106.25$108,072.32$31,966.0742.00%
Consumer Products$69,932.10$101,355.65$31,423.5444.93%
Non-Profit, Social Impact, & Social Work$56,424.03$87,435.68$31,011.6554.96%
Hospitals, Medicine, & Healthcare Services$77,709.31$108,655.69$30,946.3839.82%
Arts, Media, News, Sports, & Entertainment$72,803.16$103,537.98$30,734.8242.22%
Manufacturing$73,308.16$103,462.57$30,154.4141.13%
Pharma, Medical Devices, & Biotech$84,697.93$114,818.01$30,120.0835.56%
Telecommunications$78,396.67$106,207.09$27,810.4235.47%
Diversified Financial Services$79,865.37$106,250.91$26,385.5433.04%
Chemicals & Plastics$81,884.71$107,058.33$25,173.6230.74%
Automotive, Transportation, & Logistics$74,636.30$99,603.13$24,966.8333.45%
Commercial Banking$71,559.05$95,869.06$24,310.0133.97%
Venture Capital$100,072.37$124,145.00$24,072.6324.06%
Construction, Repair, & Maintenance$68,913.04$92,041.67$23,128.6233.56%
Environment, Natural Resources, & Mining$81,500.00$104,270.75$22,770.7527.94%
Aerospace & Aviation$76,244.90$98,731.31$22,486.4129.49%
Energy, Oil, Gas, and Utilities$88,756.32$109,974.84$21,218.5223.91%
Accounting & Audit$67,952.73$88,946.59$20,993.8630.89%
Other$66,157.53$83,802.02$17,644.4926.67%
Restaurants, Hotels, Tourism, & Hospitality$68,521.15$83,502.75$14,981.6021.86%
Education$59,681.99$74,507.75$14,825.7624.84%
Government, Military, & Politics$77,645.73$90,631.16$12,985.4316.72%
Law$97,229.17$105,366.67$8,137.508.37%

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Yale SOM Picks Chicago Economist To Succeed Ted Snyder


University of Chicago Professor Kerwin Charles will become dean of Yale’s School of Management

Yale University’s School of Management today (March 5) named a University of Chicago economist with no experience in business education as its new dean. Kerwin Kofi Charles, a distinguished service professor at the Harris School of Public Policy and the college in the University of Chicago for more than 18 years, will succeed Edward ‘Ted’ Snyder on July 1.

  • Charles, one of only a handful of African-Americans to become dean of a major business school and the first dean of color at SOM, will be following one of the most successful business school deans of his generation. 
 
Snyder came to Yale eight years ago after two previous deanships at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business and the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business. Since his arrival at SOM, Snyder has extended the business school’s global reach, most notably by founding the 30-school Global Network for Advanced Management that has resulted in a number of innovations. He also has moved the school up in numerous rankings, boosted graduate enrollment, and deepened SOM’s connections to Yale University.
Yale passed over two highly qualified and admired deputy deans who have been instrumental in the school’s increasing prominence under Snyder: Anjani Jain, deputy dean for academic programs, and David Bach, deputy dean for academic programs. One of Charles’ first tasks will be to try to retain their expertise to allow SOM to build on the momentum Snyder’s senior leadership team has created.

Best MBAs for Entrepreneurship Reputation

RankSchoolScore
1Stanford4.38
2UC at Berkeley (Haas)4.13
3Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)4.03
3Georgetown (McDonough)4.03
5Washington (Foster)4.00
6MIT (Sloan)3.98
6Yale3.98
8INSEAD3.96
9Rice (Jones)3.95
10IESE Business School3.93
11Cornell (Johnson)3.90
12Brigham Young (Marriott)3.87
13North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)3.81
14Texas at Austin (McCombs)3.80
15Virginia (Darden)3.79
16Columbia3.78
17Chicago (Booth)3.74
18USC (Marshall)3.73
18Vanderbilt (Owen)3.73
20Pennsylvania (Wharton)3.67
21Duke (Fuqua)3.66
22Harvard3.65
23UCLA (Anderson)3.62
24Northwestern (Kellogg)3.61
25Emory (Goizueta)3.58
25IMD3.58
25London Business School3.58
28NYU (Stern)3.56
29Michigan (Ross)3.54
30Dartmouth (Tuck)3.49

Best MBA for Entrepreneurship Skills

RankSchoolScore
1Stanford4.57
2Washington (Foster)4.25
3UC at Berkeley (Haas)4.13
4Georgetown (McDonough)4.10
5Rice (Jones)4.03
6MIT (Sloan)4.02
7INSEAD4.01
8Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)4.00
9IESE Business School3.97
10Brigham Young (Marriott)3.96
11Yale3.89
12Texas at Austin (McCombs)3.88
13Harvard3.84
14Chicago (Booth)3.78
14North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)3.78
16Cornell (Johnson)3.76
16Virginia (Darden)3.76
18Columbia3.70
19Duke (Fuqua)3.68
19UCLA (Anderson)3.68
21USC (Marshall)3.62
22Pennsylvania (Wharton)3.59
23IMD3.58
24Northwestern (Kellogg)3.57
24Vanderbilt (Owen)3.57
26London Business School3.56
27NYU (Stern)3.55
28Dartmouth (Tuck)3.48
29Emory (Goizueta)3.47
30Michigan (Ross)3.46

Best Trained MBAs

RankSchoolScore
1Brigham Young (Marriott)4.17
1Georgetown (McDonough)4.17
3Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)4.10
4North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)4.01
4Yale4.01
6Columbia3.97
6INSEAD3.97
6Pennsylvania (Wharton)3.97
9IESE Business School3.95
10Chicago (Booth)3.94
11USC (Marshall)3.93
12IMD3.92
12Rice (Jones)3.92
12Washington (Foster)3.92
15Northwestern (Kellogg)3.91
16Cornell (Johnson)3.90
16MIT (Sloan)3.90
18UCLA (Anderson)3.89
19UC at Berkeley (Haas)3.84
20Texas at Austin (McCombs)3.83
21Stanford3.81
22Duke (Fuqua)3.79
23Vanderbilt (Owen)3.78
24Virginia (Darden)3.76
25London Business School3.74
26Michigan (Ross)3.69
27Emory (Goizueta)3.68
28Harvard3.65
29NYU (Stern)3.60
30Dartmouth (Tuck)3.58

The Most Diverse MBAs

RankSchoolScore
1Yale4.18
2Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)4.17
2INSEAD4.17
4IESE Business School4.15
5IMD4.08
5Washington (Foster)4.08
7Georgetown (McDonough)4.07
8Texas at Austin (McCombs)4.06
9Rice (Jones)4.05
9UC at Berkeley (Haas)4.05
11USC (Marshall)3.98
12North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)3.94
13Columbia3.93
13Cornell (Johnson)3.93
15UCLA (Anderson)3.92
16Chicago (Booth)3.90
16Stanford3.90
18Duke (Fuqua)3.88
18NYU (Stern)3.88
20London Business School3.86
21Northwestern (Kellogg)3.80
22MIT (Sloan)3.78
23Virginia (Darden)3.77
24Harvard3.74
24Pennsylvania (Wharton)3.74
24Vanderbilt (Owen)3.74
27Emory (Goizueta)3.69
28Michigan (Ross)3.65
29Dartmouth (Tuck)3.52
30Brigham Young (Marriott)3.13

Most Innovative & Creative MBAs

RankSchoolScore
1Stanford4.29
2Yale4.18
3Georgetown (McDonough)4.17
4UC at Berkeley (Haas)4.13
5Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)4.10
6Vanderbilt (Owen)4.09
7INSEAD4.01
8North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)4.00
8Washington (Foster)4.00
10IESE Business School3.98
11UCLA (Anderson)3.97
12Brigham Young (Marriott)3.96
12Duke (Fuqua)3.96
12IMD3.96
15Cornell (Johnson)3.94
15MIT (Sloan)3.94
15Northwestern (Kellogg)3.94
15Virginia (Darden)3.94
19Texas at Austin (McCombs)3.93
20Chicago (Booth)3.91
21Rice (Jones)3.89
22Columbia3.88
23USC (Marshall)3.84
24Emory (Goizueta)3.81
25Michigan (Ross)3.76
26London Business School3.71
27Pennsylvania (Wharton)3.70
28NYU (Stern)3.69
29Dartmouth (Tuck)3.66
29Harvard3.66

MBA Schools: Highest Brand Value

RankSchoolScore
1Stanford4.69
2Harvard4.56
3Pennsylvania (Wharton)4.50
4Georgetown (McDonough)4.41
5MIT (Sloan)4.40
6INSEAD4.36
6Yale4.36
8IMD4.35
9Columbia4.27
10Chicago (Booth)4.26
11UC at Berkeley (Haas)4.18
12Brigham Young (Marriott)4.17
12Washington (Foster)4.17
14IESE Business School4.16
15London Business School4.14
15Virginia (Darden)4.14
17Carnegie Mellon (Tepper)4.13
17Northwestern (Kellogg)4.13
19Duke (Fuqua)4.12
20Cornell (Johnson)4.11
21Vanderbilt (Owen)4.09
22Rice (Jones)4.08
23Dartmouth (Tuck)4.06
24North Carolina (Kenan-Flagler)4.04
25Texas at Austin (McCombs)4.01
26USC (Marshall)4.00
27NYU (Stern)3.96
28Michigan (Ross)3.91
28UCLA (Anderson)3.91
30Emory (Goizueta)3.85

MBA Brand Value Of Specific B-Schools


Bloomberg Businessweek bases its ranking of full-time MBA programs on surveys from 3,698 employers who recruit MBA graduates.

The magazine made public recruiter responses on a half dozen survey questions, including which schools’ brand value gives graduates a big advantage in their careers, which schools produce the most innovative and creative graduates, and which provide the most diverse pool of quality candidates. 


  • When asked, for example, which school’s graduates are “better trained than grads from other schools,” Brigham Young University’s Marriott School of Business and Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business were tied for first, with a score of 4.17 on a five-point scale, with five reflecting the highest grade possible. Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business was third, scoring 4.10, while the University of North Carolina’s Kenan-Flagler Business School and Yale University’s School of Management were tied for fourth place, with a score of 4.01. Stanford ranked 21st, while Harvard languished in 28th place.
  • Recruiters put Stanford at the top of the list, with the highest average score of any category, a 4.69. The GSB was followed by Harvard and Wharton. Georgetown’s McDonough School finished fourth, while MIT Sloan was fifth. INSEAD and Yale tied for sixth place, followed by IMD, Columbia and Chicago Booth.
  • In  terns of innovative and creative skills Harvard Business School tied with Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business in 29th place. Harvard’s archrival on the West Coast, Stanford, topped the category. Yale, Georgetown, Berkeley and Carnegie Mellon rounded out the top five.
  • In terms of reputation, Stanford Graduate School of Business came out first, with the University of Washington’s Foster School of Business second, UC-Berkeley’s Haas School of Business third, Georgetown fourth and Rice University fifth. 
  • For entrepreneurial skills  Stanford still came out first but Berkeley was second, with Carnegie Mellon and Georgetown tied for third. The University of Washington came in fifth.

Friday, February 8, 2019

Acceptance Rates At The Top 50 U.S. Schools














A Poets&Quants analysis of acceptance rates at the top 50 U.S. schools reveals that en masse, the numbers are going up
  • Applications at about 80% of schools are down, by a little or by a lot, meaning it looks likely that admissions offices are compensating by opening the gates a little wider. 
  • Of 49 schools that made their acceptance rate and related data available, 38 saw their application volume drop between 2017 and 2018, by an average of nearly 200 applications; included in the roster of schools with declines are nine of the top 10 schools.
  • Only 10 schools saw app volume go up, by an average of just 68 apps. 
  • Acceptance rates seemed to respond, going up at 34 schools, including eight of the top 10 schools, while dropping at only 11 others. Among the schools that saw increases were Stanford, which again has the lowest acceptance rate at 6.3%.
  • Serious MBA applicants should consider ‘acceptance rate’ when crafting their target list of schools. This is a proxy for the selectivity, prestige, and market demand of a given MBA program. 

  • A relatively low 6.3% acceptance rate at Stanford should not discourage an applicant whose GPA, GMAT, and resume are above the class average.
  • Likewise, a relatively high 30% acceptance rate at Cornell Johnson should not encourage an applicant whose GPA, GMAT, and resume are clearly weaker than that school’s class average.
ONLY 4 SCHOOLS IN TOP 50 SEE DOUBLE-DIGIT RISE IN APPLICATIONS 
  • In the top 10, only Dartmouth College’s Tuck School of Business saw an increase — of just 11 applications.
  • In fact, only four schools in the top 50 saw double-digit rises in application volume between 2017 and 2018, led by Ohio State Fisher’s 32.4% increase from 444 to 588.
  • Of the four, it is notable that three are public schools. Perhaps the most interesting case is at Arizona State, where a seesaw continues: Two years ago, the school saw a 161.6% jump in apps following its decision to offer all admits a full two-year scholarship; the next year apps snapped back with a 45.3% drop. This year, however, the Carey School is back up by more than 20%, the second-biggest rise of any top-50 school.
  •  Of the 34 schools with increases in their acceptance rates, 25 saw them go up by 2 percentage points or more; seven saw double-digit increases, including an 18-point jump at Vanderbilt University’s Owen Graduate School of Management, to 61% from 43%.
  • Hardest hit: Purdue University’s Krannert School of Management, where apps dropped by more than 30%, from 332 in 2017 to 231 last fall. Going back to 2016, when it had 453 applications, Krannert’s application volume has fallen by 49%.
  • Thirty-eight schools saw their application volumes drop, at an average of 198 apps per school


 The biggest declines in terms of actual number
  1. 447 at Wharton
  2. 465 at Harvard
  3. 385 at Chicago Booth
  4. 490 at Yale SOM
  5. 508 applications at Texas-Austin’s McCombs School of Business
  6. 226  (27.8%) aat Rice University’s Jones Graduate School of Business
  7. 393 at UNC’s Kenan-Flagler Business School. 
  8. 490 at  Virginia’s Darden School of Business,

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

The Best Business Schools for Finance

Though it has been over a decade since the global financial crisis of 2008, investment banking and the financial services industry still aren’t the same. 

Overall, the percentage of MBAs interested in a career in finance has made a slight recovery, but the products/services and tech industries still lure more and more grads. 

According to the most recent 2018 Alumni Perspectives Survey Report by the Graduate Management Admission Council, the percentage of alumni from two-year, full-time MBA programs working in the finance/accounting industry was 16 percent in 2018, compared to 11 percent in 2017.  

Products/services and technology maintained the lead at 19 percent each.  

Government/nonprofit (12 percent) surpassed consulting (10 percent) as the fourth most popular choice of 2018 graduates.  At the top schools, however, consulting has remained a top contender for a career path as about 30 percent of MBA graduates choose it.

Still, finance is an interesting, lucrative career path for MBA graduates. The work can be widely varied, giving quants ample opportunity to engage their analytical expertise. 

Not only that, the average graduate earns more than $115,000 in her first year based on the latest U.S. News & World Report. 

And beyond the money and the work itself, there’s also considerable prestige in working for top firms, which include Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan/Chase, Bank of America, Merrill Lynch, Deutsche Bank, and Blackstone, among others.

For many, finance presents a dynamic, rewarding career path that can also serve as a jumping off point for many future opportunities, including starting your own firm. For those of you with this route in mind, we’ve gathered together a list of business schools best positioned to help you earn a job in the finance industry.

Latest School Placements & Earnings
There are multiple ranking systems that examine top MBA programs for finance. The Financial Times, for example, segments out its own list—Top MBAs for Finance—as part of its annual global ranking of top MBA programs. 

For 2018, the ranking placed Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) in the #1 slot, with alumni from that school three years out from graduation earning an average salary of $252,000. Stanford is not only the top school for earnings, but also sent the most graduates into the field of top-tier programs. Stanford GSB sent 38 percent of its 2017 graduates into finance, only matched by NYU / Stern (ranked 5) and Cornell Johnson (ranked 18).

For the purposes of this article, we’re going to review the schools that send the greatest percentage of their students into finance and, particularly, investment banking. Typically, this statistic indicates that more of the school’s resources will be allocated toward preparing graduates for success in the field, both in terms of faculty and coursework and in terms of career services, including cultivating relationships with industry employers and bringing in top recruiters to snap up those students.

These Schools Send More of Their MBA Grads into Investment Banking
Five schools lead the pack in terms of percentage of graduates in the Class of 2018 heading into finance and, particularly, investment banking. 

While 31 percent of Stanford GSB’s Class of 2018 went into finance, only 2 percent took on investment banking roles.  Two of the top five—Columbia Business School and NYU Stern School of Business—are located in New York City, one of the world’s greatest financial hubs. Two more—the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and the University of Chicago Business School—are known as quant-focused finance powerhouses. Cornell’s S.C. Johnson Graduate School of Management has also begun to establish a solid foothold in the investment banking space.

Here’s what portion of grads these top schools send into finance, at a glance:

Columbia Business School—32.2 percent (12.3 percent investment banking/brokerage)

University of Chicago Booth School of Business—31.6 percent (10.5 percent investment banking/brokerage)

New York University Stern School of Business—33.8 percent (26.2 percent investment banking/brokerage)

University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School—36.9 percent (13 percent investment banking/brokerage)

Cornell’s Johnson Graduate School of Management—32 percent (19 percent investment banking/brokerage)

The percentage of 2018 graduates heading into finance has only increased at the Wharton School over the Class of 2017.  At Columbia, the 33.6 percent taking jobs in consulting narrowly outpaced the 32.2 percent heading into finance. At the other four schools, financial services drew more grads than consulting—the second most common industry destination. At NYU Stern, 33.8 percent went into financial services, as compared to just 28.4 percent heading into consulting. At Chicago Booth, it was 31.6 percent financial services, followed by 31 percent consulting. At Wharton, the stats were 36.9 percent financial services, trailed by 25 percent consulting. And finally, at Johnson, 32 percent of Class of 2018 grads headed into jobs in financial services, as compared to 25 percent going into consulting.

What Those Newly Minted MBAs Get Paid
Next, let’s take a look at salaries. Graduates heading into financial services. 

Columbia Business School reported a median salary in finance of $134,718 overall, and $125,000 in investment banking.  

Wharton followed at a median of $130,000 starting salaries in finance, and $125,000 in investment banking.  

The average salary out of Cornell / Johnson increased slightly to $128,254 compared to last year in finance, and $137,738 was the average for those going into investment banking. 

Booth and NYU / Stern noted that the average salary for graduates entering finance was $125,000, and also the same for investment banking. 

In every case, an average signing bonus of approximately $40,000 to $50,000 was de rigueur.

A Closer Look at the Finance Faculty
While the endgame—where graduates land jobs—is understandably on everyone’s mind, we’d like to posit that who students learn from and what they learn is equally as important a consideration in where to attend business school. In this next section we’ll take a closer look at the finance faculty and related coursework at each of these leading finance schools.

Faculty and Coursework at Columbia
Nobel Laureate and Columbia Professor Joseph Stiglitz
The advantages of a New York City location are also reflected in CBS’s faculty and coursework. The Finance division and Economics division together account for more than half of all classes and counting approximately 50 faculty members, including adjunct and visiting professors. As at Stern, their backgrounds represent a powerful mix of theory and practice. In addition, many of its finance courses involve visits from industry professionals, allowing students to gain a better understanding of how their course material applies to the real world. Among CBS’s star professors is Joseph Stiglitz, former senior vice president of development economics and chief economist of the World Bank, who won the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2001 for the analysis of markets with asymmetric information.

Also of potential interest to aspiring bankers, the CBS core includes a half-term course called “Global Economic Environment.” Taken during the spring semester, it examines the way a company’s performance and management may be influenced by external factors across an entire economy, drawing on current events to illustrate the practical implications of the concepts covered.

CBS’s Program for Financial Studies also offers suggested electives for students pursuing careers in investment banking and corporate banking. These include “Financial Statement Analysis and Valuation,” which covers how firms communicate with one another through financial statements and involves analyses of publicly traded companies; “Debt Markets,” which provides a comprehensive survey of the five major debt markets and their derivative dependencies, and “Advanced International Corporate Finance,” which explores varied decision-making situations regarding international capital budgeting.

There is also a Value Investing area of focus available to CBS students, administered by the Heilbrunn Center for Graham & Dodd Investing. Designed to teach students to find value that the market might not see and make profitable investments accordingly, this focus area includes courses ranging from “Security Analysis,” which teaches students to make investment decisions by analyzing business models and financial statements, to “Distressed Value Investing,” which covers the opportunities of investing in companies in bankruptcy.

Finally, second-year MBA students at CBS also can participate in project-based electives called Master Classes, in which they analyze the problems of a partner organization and make a recommendation on the issue at hand, and several involve projects related to investment banking.

Faculty and Coursework at Chicago Booth
Chicago Booth has long been considered a powerhouse in terms of its finance faculty and coursework. With approximately 40 finance professors on staff, Chicago Booth offers students interested in financial services careers access to a wealth of research, expertise, and course offerings in this area.
Nobel Laureate and Chicago Booth Professor Eugene Fama
Faculty members include the distinguished Eugene Fama, who is known as the “father of modern finance” for his research on markets and market efficiency and holds the 2013 Nobel Prize in Economics. There’s also Steven Neil Kaplan, a professor of entrepreneurship and finance who ranks among the top 60 in paper downloads and paper citations on the SSRN (Social Science Research Network). Other finance professors bring experience as executives of major investment banks, board members of public and private companies, and members of the Federal Reserve Board.

In terms of coursework, Chicago Booth’s MBA curriculum is known for its flexible structure. To fulfill disciplinary requirements, students are able to select one of 14 options to tailor their studies to their interests, objectives, and current level of knowledge.

Under the Foundation Courses element of the core, Chicago Booth students take one course each in “Financial Accounting,” “Microeconomics,” and “Statistics.” Students can select a Fundamental Course in each of these areas or select from a list of Advanced Alternatives if they already demonstrate a sound foundation in the subject.

In addition to enrolling in three Foundation courses, Chicago Booth students can choose one of 14 areas of specialization. While not required, students usually choose between one and three concentrations to develop the tools and analytic skills relevant to areas of particular interest.

Chicago Booth students who hope to enter investment banking might choose to concentrate in both Accounting and Finance. Through the Accounting concentration, students learn how to assess a firm’s financial health while making investment decisions. The Finance concentration, meanwhile, covers both corporate finance and investments, preparing students to make decisions at the business and market levels. Among the courses offered as part of the Finance concentration are “Advanced Investments,” which picks up where the introductory “Investments” class leaves off, examining the activities of top financial institutions and the changes in asset pricing over the past 20 years. Other courses include “Financial Instruments,” which examines the pricing of de­rivatives with a pointed focus on managing risk, and “Financial Markets and Institutions,” which delves into studies of financial institutions, financial crises, and the design of financial contracts.

And students seeking a very deep grounding in finance theory and practice could also complete the Analytic Finance concentration, which will equip them to apply sophisticated quantitative tools to complex financial questions in a range of contexts.

Faculty and Coursework at NYU Stern
While top-tier business schools across the board boast star faculty and fantastic foundational courses in finance, NYU Stern sets itself apart in terms of the array of specializations offered that are especially relevant to students interested in financial services.
Nobel Laureate and NYU Stern Professor Robert Engle

Of its 25 specializations, seven in particular—Banking, Corporate Finance, Finance, Financial Instruments and Markets, Financial Systems and Analytics, Quantitative Finance, and FinTech—fall into this category, and Stern students can take up to three. Stern also offers a number of individual courses focused on the investment banking field, including “Law and Business of Investment Banking,” “Investment Banking,” “Private Equity in Entertainment and Media” and “Entertainment Finance.”

As for its finance faculty, in addition to more than four dozen full-time faculty in the field, there are also more than 50 adjunct faculty members and visiting professors. This combination of leading academics and practitioners includes NYU Stern Finance Professor Robert Engle, who won the 2003 Nobel Prize in Economics for his work on statistical modeling of time-varying volatility, as well as Professor Edward Altman, who was named one of the “100 Most Influential People in Finance” by the Treasury & Risk Management magazine in 2005.

Faculty and Coursework at Wharton
At Wharton, there are approximately 40 standing finance faculty, which doubles when you include the secondary, affiliated, and emeritus faculty. This offers Wharton MBA students the opportunity to learn from professionals with a wide range of specializations from international banking to corporate investment and financing.
Wharton Professor Michael Roberts

As for the leading practitioners at the school, there are many professors that stand out. For example, Michael Roberts has won more than 30 awards over the course of his teaching and research career including the 2004, 2006, and 2008 Excellence in Teaching Award at the Wharton School as well as the Jensen Prize—for his first-place paper on corporate finance and organizations published in the Journal of Financial Economics 2016. There’s also Robert P. Inman who has consulted for various esteemed organizations around the world, including the World Bank from 1994 to the present and the Republic of South Africa from 1994 to 2000. And it’s hard to think of finance at Wharton without Professor Jeremy Siegel immediately coming to mind. In addition to teaching at Wharton, Siegel comments extensively on the economy and financial markets in regular appearances on networks including CNN, CNBC, and NPR.

When it comes to coursework, Wharton MBA students enjoy a flexible core curriculum that includes 19 majors and nearly 200 electives. Of those majors, students can choose between Accounting and Finance for their specializations. The Accounting major includes classes such as “Cost Management” and “Corporate Valuation,” all of which prepare students for a career in financial accounting. As for Finance, there are courses on “Corporate Finance,” which serves as an introduction to modern financial theory, as well as “Financial Derivatives,” which covers derivative securities within the modern financial architecture.

Faculty and Coursework at Cornell Johnson


Johnson Professor Harold Bierman
Cornell Johnson is another powerhouse of finance. With approximately 22 finance professors on staff, Johnson offers students interested in banking careers access to a wealth of research, expertise, and courses in this area of study. Faculty members include Harold Bierman, who has authored more than 150 books and articles in the fields of accounting, finance, investment, taxation, and quantitative analysis. There’s also Professor Murillo Campello, whose work has been cited by the Federal Reserve chairman, mentioned in Congressional hearings, described in the “Economic Report for the President,” and used to advise the U.S. Supreme Court.

As for coursework, Johnson is known for its flexible two-year and one-year MBA programs. As part of the core courses, MBA students are expected to take “Financial Accounting,” “Microeconomics for Management,” and “Managerial Finance” in their first semester. In their second semester, students can choose between seven immersion experiences, three of which deal with the finance industry.

The Corporate Finance Immersion (CFI) teaches MBA students to apply theory with hands-on experience. Students who choose CFI gain a comprehensive understanding of the issues that CFOs encounter and take courses and practicum sessions that give them a competitive edge in the industry. There are also two other Immersion options for students including Investment Banking (IBI) and Investment Research and Asset Management (IRAM). In IBI, MBA students analyze actual transactions and develop new business pitches for CEOs. In IRAM, students acquire critical financial modeling knowledge, analytical tools, and hands-on experience. Some of the courses offered in these immersion experiences include “Financial Statement Analysis,” “Financial Modeling,” “Valuation,” and “Financial Policy.”

Finally, MBA students at Johnson can choose up to two concentrations out of seven offered to go in depth into a specific area of study including Corporate Finance, Financial Investing, and Financial Analysis.

Where Within Investment Banking Do Recent Grads Land?
When it comes to investment banking and brokerage, NYU Stern is the clear frontrunner, sending a whopping 26.2 percent of its Class of 2018 to work in this field. By comparison, the other four schools all sent between 10 (Chicago Booth) and 19 (Cornell Johnson) percent into banking.

But beyond the sheer volume of grads heading into the field, the prestige of the firms where they land is also an indicator of the relative strength of the various MBA programs. Where are graduates from a given school getting jobs in investment banking? Historically, the term “bulge bracket” has been used to refer to the elite banks—harkening to a time when the names of top-tier banks appeared first and largest on financial industry advertisements. But in recent years, the terminology has shifted toward tier-one, tier-two, and tier-three banks.

While there is not absolute consensus about which banks fall into which tiers, a 2018 release from research firm Coalition identified the tier-one banks as including JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Citi, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch (in that order). It went on to list tier-two investment banks as comprising Deutsche, Barclays, Credit Suisse, and HSBC, respectively. In our examination of leading MBA programs for finance, we’ve chosen to zero in on which schools help grads get into these firms.


JP Morgan Chase & Co., another leading MBA recruiter for banking

At Columbia, Goldman Sachs was the top finance employer, hiring 16 graduates. Morgan Stanley hired 6 graduates, Citi 8 graduates, and JP Morgan 9 graduates. In total, 40 graduates earned a position with a tier-one bank (including five at Bank of America Merrill Lynch). Notably, Columbia’s Board of Overseers includes at least three members with deep connections to Morgan Stanley: CBS Dean Emeritus and Professor Meyer Feldberg (MBA ’65), who is a senior advisor at the firm; R. Bradford Evans (MBA ’70), also a senior advisor, and James P. Gorman (MBA ’87), chairman and CEO.

Chicago Booth sent most of its MBA graduates in finance to the JP Morgan (12 graduates) followed by Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley (7 graduates each), and Citi (6 graduates). In all, a total of 42 graduates headed to a tier-one bank.

NYU Stern, Wharton, and Cornell Johnson are more guarded with their employment stats. NYU Stern notes companies that hired more than three graduates, but not how many more. An asterisk denoting three or more hires appeared beside every tier-one and tier-two bank for the Class of 2018 save HSBC.

Cornell Johnson, likewise, does not provide specific number of hires, sharing simply that all tier-one and tier-two banks recruit and hire at the school. And Wharton denotes the following top-tier banks as having hired more than two graduates: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, and Morgan Stanley.

Investment banking took a severe hit in the aftermath of the financial crisis as strong students following a traditionally clear and safe path suddenly found themselves with nowhere to land after graduation. For several years following the crash—subsequent MBA classes avoided IB like the plague, fearful that they too might graduate jobless, or that jobs they did get could disappear when the next “too big to fail” bank went under. Case in point, 33.1 percent of Columbia 2007 MBA graduates went into investment banking and brokerage. By the Class of 2012, that number had fallen to 21 percent.

As evidenced above, investment banking has rebounded some at some schools from those darkest days, but not to its pre-crash levels. This means MBA students who in the past followed scores of others like them along the IB route now are exploring other paths. For some, that’s meant consulting or technology. But others have looked for ways to put their financial prowess to work on the buy side. This diversification within financial services is why all of the schools we’ve highlighted here still report sending a third or more of their graduates into finance.

Looking Beyond the Classroom and Recruiter Relationships
Finance faculty and curriculum and are an important consideration in choosing a school. Placement rates with leading recruiters in the specific area or areas of financial services you hope to pursue are another.

But these are not the only indicators of an MBA program’s strengths in training its students to succeed in finance. Another important set of criteria to examine in deciding which business schools to target are the clubs, treks, centers, and other extracurricular opportunities that help round out the education students receive in the classroom.

Student-Led Finance Clubs
Extracurricular activities can play a pivotal role in helping students navigate the job search process successfully. Clubs focused on investment banking at many of the schools we’ve highlighted provide valuable networking and informational events for students. They also often complement some of the resources offered through career services centers, offering peer coaching and interview prep to students as they go through the recruiting process.

CBS features an Investment Banking Club (IBC), which maintains strong ties to Wall Street and provides more than 100 networking, recruiting, and informational events each year. Area investment banks co-sponsor events with the IBC and participate in merger and acquisition case studies, panels, and interview workshops.

The IBC also runs internal programs helping first-year students explore the industry, hosts social gatherings, and puts on events such as a Training the Street Workshop and the Interview Power Prep Session with Professor Donna Hitscherich. Together with the club’s case presentations, résumé reviews and mock interview preparation, these events complement the school’s other resources for helping prepare students for investment banking careers.

At Johnson, the Old Ezra Finance Club offers a coordinated approach to investment banking. Throughout the year, various club meetings provide prospective bankers with the resources needed to secure internship placements at premier institutions such as Barclays, Citi, Credit Suisse, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and more. The Old Ezra approach focuses mainly on interview and networking preparation of potential candidates.

At Chicago Booth, the Investment Banking Group (IBG) is one of the largest student groups on the Chicago Booth campus. There is also a more general Chicago Booth Finance Club for students who may be interested in more than just investment banking.

At Wharton, students convene as part of the Wharton Finance Club, which caters to students interested in investment banking, non-banking corporate finance, and private wealth management. And Wharton also has a student-led MBA Private Equity and Venture Capital Club that claims to be one of the largest and most active professional clubs at the school, with more than 700 members.

In addition to providing resources to current students, student clubs are also a fantastic way for prospective applicants to learn more about schools they are interested in. If finance is your intended path, you’d do well to identify students in leadership roles in clubs that interest you and reach out to learn more about their experiences, both in finance and at their chosen school.

Treks
Many MBA student professional clubs, career services, and courses also offer unique industry trek experiences for students. These experiences typically take a small group of MBA students to a city, region, or country where they can explore, interact with, and learn more about their industry of interest. In most instances, the students visit various companies in their industry and enjoy presentations, Q&A sessions, and various networking opportunities.

At Columbia, the IBC takes students to meet with U.K. investment banks as part of London Banking Days. This two-day event includes panels on banking, sales and trading, and private wealth management, as well as an evening networking event. Participating firms have included Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, and Credit Suisse.

Chicago Booth MBA students can take a student trek to cities around the world including New York, Los Angeles, Tokyo, Bangalore, London, Hong Kong, and Buenos Aires. For example, there’s an investment banking trek in NYC, which follows up with many of the same firms that come recruiting at the campus.

At NYU Stern, there’s an industry immersion experience in Investment Banking that allows students to learn specific industry knowledge from engaged alums and sponsoring organizations. Specifically, the Investment Banking Immersion (IBI) features four intensive sessions with alumni mentors at Citi’s office in downtown Tribeca.

Then, Cornell Johnson offers student treks organized by geographic concentration, industry sector, or both. Each trek is completely set up by a club including the Investment Management Club (IMC), which each year takes a series of fall treks to New York and Boston to visit JP Morgan, Barclays, Fidelity, and more.

Centers
Then there are the research centers and institutions offered at the various schools. These centers are a focal point for different disciplines and industries, including finance. For example, Johnson has the Parker Center for Investment Research, which offers students instruction and training in the latest analytical tools used on Wall Street, specifically those that can help with careers in investment research and asset management. Another unique opportunity for Johnson students is the Cayuga Fund, a $1 million endowment managed by students as part of a formal class in investments.

At Wharton there are four centers for finance including the Alternative Investments Initiative, which focuses on private equity, hedge funds, venture capital, and wealth management, and the Rodney L. White Center for Financial Research, which was founded in 1969 to support high quality financial economics research.

Chicago Booth has the Fama-Miller Center for Research in Finance, which is designed to enhance academic research in finance, while the Center for Research in Security Prices bridges the gap between theory and practice when it comes to the market. And NYU Stern has the Salomon Center for the Study of Financial Institutions, which looks at commercial banks, investment banks, managed funds, and insurance companies. While CBS has the Advanced Projects and Applied Research in Fintech program, which takes on novel research projects that push the boundaries of technology and finance.

In Closing
Though we’ve focused on the five schools that send more of their grads into finance than any others, that’s certainly not to say that graduates from other schools don’t go on to have incredibly rewarding careers in finance. Stanford and Harvard, for example, send more of their graduates into the highly lucrative private equity field than any of those included here.

This is just to say that this limited list is by no means intended to limit your consideration of MBA programs that can help you reach your finance and investment banking career goals. Rather, we hope that by highlighting the strengths of a handful of programs we’ve given you a critical lens through which you can evaluate additional programs.